Cancer Staging and Skilled Helper Model

Diagram OF THE SKILLED HELPER MODEL Gerard Egan depicted 3 phases in his helping model, which he sees as a â€Å"map that helps . . . in your connections with clients†. †Each stage can bolster the helpee in posing an inquiry of themselves. Stage 1: Current situation: â€Å"What is here? † †¢ This is tied in with building a confiding in relationship with the helpee and helping them to investigate and explain their difficult circumstance. †¢ It manages what's going on now for the helpee. Stage II: Preferred situation: â€Å"What do I need here? † †¢ This is tied in with encouraging the helpee to distinguish what they need. †¢ It is tied in with recognizing what choices are available to the helpee. Stage III: Action: â€Å"How may I help this to occur? † †¢ This is tied in with supporting the helpee to take a gander at how they may support themselves. †¢ It is tied in with taking a gander at potential results Note: The stag es don't really follow this request †helping connections don't move in an orderly fashion! Customer focused aiding is liquid and adaptable †and follows the helpee †maybe moving in a winding, round and down. This model is valuable in helping us to take a gander at the distinctive ‘stages’ that we may involvement in a helpee as our relationship creates. †Egan, G. (1994) The Skilled Helper: a Problem Management Approach toHelping. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company (361. 323) Overview of Skilled Helper Model, H Baker, 2009 â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€ Helper Skills: compassion; upr; coinciding; reaching; reflecting; attending(to conduct and feeling); explaining; rewording. Partner Skills: Stage I + recognizing subjects; focussing; offering elective points of view; sharing assistant experience/emotions; helping customer move to Stage III. Assistant Skills: Stage II + encourage helpee in creating and picking approaches to support se lf; causing helpee to consider and assess their decisions.

Extinction free essay sample

Utilizing the word â€Å"thou,† showering once every year, and sprucing up at air terminals are everything that were once rehearsed strictly not, at this point a need of today’s ever-evolving world. Annihilation is a piece of the characteristic development of our reality. The cycle asserted the dinosaur and the dodo flying creature, chime bottoms and speakeasies. Be that as it may, in the event that I could wave my hands in a roundabout movement, float within the sight of the god-like and spare one thing from this endless loop it would be writing. For through writing, we as a general public can shape thoughts and practices that at no other time entered our thoughts. A wellspring of inquiries, thoughts, youth, genuine excellence, love, desire, and everything without exception found on the mind boggling palette of human feeling and thoroughly considered releases the pages of writing marinating our cerebrums in the possibility that there is a great deal more. Our reality i s a position of broken forms and broke discriminatory constraints. We will compose a custom article test on Termination or on the other hand any comparative point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Award it Gossip Girl and The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants presumably had nothing to do with it, however any semblance of Socrates, Thoreau, and Twain did. In the case of considering theory on the shores of Walden Pond or finding out about how to be a genuine companion with Huckleberry Finn, writing can take us to spots and considerations simply out of our span. For writing tests the restrictions of our spirits and the heading of our souls essentially through words splattered in ink in like manner onto paper. It is the heartbeat of human idea siphoning thoughts into our ever-evolving methods of reasoning. To spare writing from termination I would ask the existence where it would be without works of fiction and reality that roused the incredible masterminds within recent memory and those before us. Where might we be if Shakespeare never asked, â€Å"To be or not to be?† Where might we be if Gatsby never longed for the green light, or if Atticus Finch never went to bat for e quivalent rights in a sweat-soaked southern court? To delete all types of writing from society is eradicate propelled thought. For due to its history with the world, the relationship it has with society, and the articulate significance of it in our way of life, writing could never get terminated in a normal world. In â€Å"Ulysses† Tennyson states, â€Å"We are not currently that quality which in days of yore Moved earth and paradise, that which we will be, we are, One equivalent temper of courageous hearts, Made frail by time and destiny, however solid in will To endeavor, to look for, to discover, and not to yield.† We can not, at this point set out on epic journeys to find new arrive on earth. However, writing has given us the mental fortitude to understand our qualities, set aside our shortcomings and like Ulysses stretch to the skyline, to take â€Å"the street less headed out by,† to raise our sails and never think back. Writing is a vessel that knows no h indrances; it is the physical proof of the improvement of the human mind. For without writing our brains would everlastingly stay inside the molds of society, caught in a set example. Knowing not of the contemplations of those that preceded us would choke us too much. For writing is an outlet to the world, a window into our spirits, and a motivation to the following extraordinary brain. Referenced: †¢ Gossip Girl Cecily Von Ziegesar †¢ The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants Ann Brashares †¢ Walden †Henry David Thoreau †¢ Huckleberry Finn-Mark Twain †¢ Hamlet-William Shakespeare †¢ To Kill A Mockingbird-Harper Lee †¢ The Great Gatsby-F. Scott Fitzgerald †¢ Ulysses-Alfred Tennyson †¢ The Road Not Taken-Robert Frost

AMD vs Intel

Of all the corporate names playing in the (PC) equipment advertise, no two organizations are apparently also known as Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Intel Corporation. That these two names are equivalent with individualized computing isn't unexpected as these two organizations fabricate the sheer larger part of the microchips which are at the center of a shopper PC.In 2008, Intel had a 76.7% piece of the overall industry of the universally useful chip showcase (which incorporates work area and server processors) to AMD’s 23.1% (Shilov, 2008). While Intel surpasses AMD 3-to-1, the two organizations joined boat 99.8% of the world’s work area and server processors.Both Intel and AMD were established from previous representatives of Fairchild Semiconductor. Intel was made in 1968 by Fairchild Engineers Bob Noyce and Gordon Moore while AMD was established in 1969 by previous Fairchild Executive Jerry Sanders and his group of representatives (Singer, 2005). Today, AMD has q uarterly incomes of $1.7 billion and Intel has yearly incomes of almost $40 billion.While both known for their processor items, both AMD and Intel began producing memory chips. The entirety of this changed in 1971 when Intel built up its 4004 †a chip intended for Japanese organization Busicom to be utilized in their line of calculators.The 4004 chip incorporated the accompanying segments †16 registers for holding information, a program counter to monitor execution, a math rationale unit to perform numerical calculations, a decoder for guidelines, and a clock to keep its procedures synchronized.Together, these parts permitted the single 4004 chip to disentangle directions put away in outer memory, directions which could contain any number of numerical calculations that the 4004 could execute. By planning a customized progression of guidelines, the 4004 could be utilized to play out any number of errands, not just the figurings required by Busicom’s calculators.This m ade the 4004 Intel’s, and therefore, the world’s first universally useful microchip chip (â€Å"Intel's First Microprocessorâ€the Intelâ ® 4004†).Intel made sure about the privilege from Busicom to advertise the 4004 as a piece of Intel’s product offering up. As an independent chip, the 4004 was the introduction of an upheaval. Rather than building a PC for each assignment without any preparation, an architect can just purchase a 4004 chip, a memory chip and compose a lot of orders for the errand at hand.A 4004 can be thought of playing out any undertaking which the specialist could program. The 4004 was then trailed by the 8008, an all the more impressive form of the 4004.By 1981, IBM had picked Intel’s 8088 as the processor to be utilized in its PC items. While the 8088 was the chip, IBM was basically picking not the 8088 but rather Intel’s x86 design as the reason for their PC family.This was significant for two reasons, first on the grounds that the IBM PC was an open norm. Any organization can manufacture a good machine purchase building it from parts which fit in with the norm. The normal model is the means by which a RAM module can be stopped out from a DELL machine and be embedded into a HP machine and work fine. Also it was on the grounds that the utilization of x86 implied that solitary chips good with Intel’s design could be utilized with PCs (â€Å"Intel Corporate Timeline†).To maintain a strategic distance from overdependence on Intel items, IBM requested that Intel should locate a second provider of chips. Along these lines, Intel contacts AMD in 1982, giving AMD full access to its 286 chip innovation and permitting AMD to fabricate 286 items. In this way to start with, AMD must be thought of as a re-appropriated producer of Intel processor structures (Singer, 2005).

Article Analysis on Marijuana

Clinical Marijuana? A young lady has HIV. Truth be told, she has had HIV for a long time. She contracted it from her sweetheart after her first sexual experience. Sadly, she has gotten ugly. Her body is currently breaking down. She is experiencing cachexia, what one would allude to as HIV squandering disorder. Cachexia characterized, is the physical squandering and lack of healthy sustenance of the body that is related with incessant illness. HIV squandering disorder makes tainted individuals get more fit and to experience the ill effects of harming the runs, in addition to other things. She is consistently in a broad measure of agony, influencing various pieces of her body. The doctors that she visits have attempted endless medicines to ease her torment; notwithstanding, nothing appears to work. There is an exploratory medication, then again, whose adequacy to mitigate HIV squandering side effects is being tried at this point. The medication that could help facilitate this youthful woman’s torment and enduring is cannabis or, at the end of the day, maryjane. Pot, in many states, is said to have no health advantages. In this way, it is viewed as a timetable 1 controlled medication by the national government. This implies weed can't be utilized as treatment for any ailments or illnesses. The little youngster presently faces the inauspicious reality that something out there might have the option to decrease her misery, but since of legislatively commanded laws, she won't have the option to acquire it legally. Numerous American residents face this situation every year. Regardless of whether cannabis is illicit or not will be not far from being obviously true in this exposition. What is up for conversation is if cannabis can be utilized as a powerful medication to furnish medicinally characterized debilitated people with help from what troubles them. As in advance of referenced, this article is to examine the legitimization or proceeded with illegalization of clinical cannabis for the numerous residents in unexpected frailty. David G. Evans composed a letter to the Time magazine editorial manager entitled, â€Å"Medical Marijuana: an oxymoron†. David G. Evans contends that the national government should proceed with the disallowance of Medical Marijuana. His most legitimized contention is the way that the Food and Drug Administration presently can't seem to support clinical maryjane for clinical use (Evans standard. 2). Then again, Kevin O’Brien and Peter A. Clark contend for the sanctioning of clinical weed in required cases. They guarantee that in certain examples clinical maryjane is the main type of medication that is successful. The two of them worked together to compose the contextual investigation â€Å"Mothers and Son: the instance of Clinical Marijuana†. A third article will be utilized to dishonor or strengthen each article’s guarantees in a prudent unpredictable way. The third article is an examination paper composed by Tia Taylor from the American College of Physicians. The article is with respect to clinical maryjane. This inside and out examined paper has exceptionally looked into and bolstered contentions. The examination paper’s objective is to explain the Physicians’ aims for clinical cannabis and to contend reasons how clinical pot could be a resource for the clinical field. The two articles are elegantly composed just as basically verifiable. In any case, one article is increasingly convincing and all the more verifiably based then the other. The contextual analysis â€Å"Mother and child: the instance of clinical marijuana† has marginally progressively sensible cases, in this way it would appear to have the better contention. While trying to be unprejudiced, a far reaching examination of the two articles is required. This will be done in a manner that talks about each author’s cases and a portion of their natural worth. The title of the main article is â€Å"Medical Marijuana: a confusing expression. † This article is a letter to the editorial manager imprinted in Time Magazine and composed by David G. Evans. David G. Evans is the official chief of the Drug-Free Schools Coalition, a program that shows kids the perils of utilizing drugs. His activity capabilities involve knowing data about pot and other hurtful medications. Thus, he is very much educated about issues of medications just as being a harsh rival of anything master sedate. He makes a lot of pertinent cases. One such case is that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) still can't seem to favor smoked cannabis as medication (Evans standard. 2). This is on the grounds that smoked weed presently can't seem to fulfill the clinical preliminary guidelines for open use. Numerous associations dismiss cannabis in light of the fact that smoked pot is â€Å"crude† or ineffectual (Evans standard. 4). Pot is certainly not a generally excellent decision of medication when contrasted with other more secure and powerful medications. Evans asserts that smoking isn't the best method to convey the medication to the body (Evans standard. 5). Notwithstanding not having the option to compute the measurements of maryjane viably, there are hurtful reactions that the utilization of weed can make. He asserts that weed use expands the odds of compulsion and medication use among kids (Evans standard. 7). He likewise asserts that marijuana’s kept mainstreaming is impeding children’s perspective on it as a hazardous medication. He proceeds to state that, the states with genius clinical pot â€Å"initiatives† have the most noteworthy measure of illicit drug habits (Evans standard. 7). He proceeds to end by saying that he is a malignant growth survivor and he knows how it feels to have sentiments of sadness (Evans standard. 9). He says that he isn't against individuals who really need clinical weed. He is contrary to the individuals who will control the framework to help their medication propensities (Evans standard. 8). The accompanying article is entitled â€Å"Mother and child: the instance of clinical marijuana† from The Hastings Center Report. This subsequent article is a contextual investigation done by Kevin 0’Brien and Peter A. Clark. The subject of the contextual investigation is a family, a mother and her seven-year-old child JJ. JJ is hyperactive and forceful; actually, he has been similar to this for a large portion of his life (Clark, O’Brien standard 1). He has seen various doctors just as had various drugs endorsed to help treat his condition (Clark, O’Brien 2). In any case, nothing appears to work adequately. JJ’s mother started attempting to discover options that might support her child. In 2001, she found that weed might support her child (Clark, O’Brian standard. 3). With counsel from her son’s doctor, she started JJ on a day by day routine of weed. Up to this point, JJ’s mother has seen improvement in her son’s condition in the wake of treating him with clinical cannabis. Clinical maryjane has helped this small kid work. Kevin O’Brien and Peter A. Clark have composed their assessments for this situation study; be that as it may, this paper will just concentrate on Peter A. Clark’s supposition for time. Subside A. Clark is a partner teacher of wellbeing organization and religious philosophy at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He is likewise the bioethicist for Mercer Health System in Philadelphia. He underpins the utilization of clinical cannabis. He fortifies his conclusion by utilizing data from eleven researchers authorized by the leader of the United States and designated by the Institute of Medicine to examine maryjane in 1999 (Clark, O’Brian standard. 14). The reports state that the advantages of the clinical utilization of maryjane are restricted on account of the unfriendly effect of the smoke. They despite everything suggested its utilization if no different choices were compelling. They additionally found that regulating the medication to wiped out individuals doesn't impact the medication utilization of the overall population. As per the examination, cannabis isn't a passage tranquilize and the way that the administration despite everything has not renamed maryjane as a calendar 2 medication is endangering the wellbeing and prosperity of numerous Americans (Clark, O’Brian standard. 14). He says that we are presently confronted with two great and terrible outcomes: weed can now and then work better than some customary strategies and maryjane has antagonistic long haul impacts that can prompt fixation (Clark, O’ Brian standard. 5). He likewise discusses the way that Marinol is an option in contrast to weed; nonetheless, it has its inadequacies (Clark, O’Brien standard. 17). Marinol is a manufactured type of cannabis. In spite of the fact that it invali dates the negative impacts of maryjane, Marinol is over the top expensive: $500 dollars for 100 ten-milligram containers. It is accounted for by patients that Marinol is exceptionally solid yet debilitates seriously after proceeded with use. He likewise says that reviews show that cannabis works more successfully than Marinol. That is the reason weed is a superior decision of medication than Marinol both exorbitance and adequacy (Clark, O’Brian standard. 17). He accepts that the main fundamental worries about clinical pot are the odds of long haul complexities and the way that the dose, soon, should be expanded (Clark, O’Brien standard. 18). He finishes by saying that it is unsuitable for doctors to will not offer restorative cannabis to patients. A few patients are enduring seriously and customary medicines are not working for them (Clark, O’Brien standard. 18). The specialist is committed to help the patient using any and all means. Both of the articles talk about whether smoked pot is a successful method to regulate cannabis to a patient. I accept that this contention is a significant contention so as to show which creator bolsters their contention with solid, genuine proof. In any case, to do this viably another increasingly demonstrated source must be presented. The third article is a paper composed by Tia Taylor from the American College of Physicians titled â€Å"Supporting Research into the Therapeutic Role of Marijuana†. This article is all the more deductively based then the other two. The article is a position paper demonstrating the American College of Physicians’ reasons why they accept the administration should bolster the logical investigation of clinical cannabis. The position paper has very elegantly composed argume

November 1st is coming up!

November 1st is coming up! It’s hard to believe that it’s been almost a year since I applied to MIT! For many of you applying EA, the deadline is fast approaching! I’m going to share my experience with applying early, and for anyone applying next year, hopefully teach you what not to do. I started early. Like, right when the application came out I jumped on it and was like, “I’m gonna get this done so early! I’m going to put so much time and energy in to this application! These essays have to be the best thing I’ve ever written!” and I wrote like crazy! I don’t enjoy writing very much (good thing I’m a blogger) and I can take hours to write a paragraph (_ _), but this time I was doing great! I finished up a few drafts and was ready to show them to someone to get some feedback. My older sister read them and provided some nice feedback. That feedback was essentially “write it again”. Oops! Looking back they were super terrible! I just listed things I liked to do/did for my community. It was incredibly boring to read. I started to re-write them and that’s when it hit me! No, not inspirition. The opposite. I realized “if I only have to change the style but keep the content, I can just do it later!” So, I didn’t re-write it yet! I waited, and waited, and waited, and waited, and waited, and waited, and waited, and, wai-oh look! the deadline to contact interviewers is coming up! I completely forgot! And oh wow! The deadline is only a week away (*cough* *cough*). And I waited! Then, the week of the deadline, a storm hit Main e. Knocking out the power for several days! I had to go to my public library (along with everyone else in town who needed to get work done) in order to finish my application. After a short period of EXTREME STRESS, I finally submitted my application on Oct. 31! And I didnt even miss Halloween because our town re-scheduled it! The relief I felt lasted almost a second. It was a wonderful second. Then the panic set in. Youre going to get nightmares of every tiny mistake you made (or think you made) on your application. This is normal. It shouldnt be, but it is! And of course, the normal anxiety that comes with applying to something as competitive as MIT. I entered a period of heavy self-flagellation. I wasnt just going to rejected because there so many great students and so few spots, but because I was just too stupid to go to here. How was I, someone who struggled in high school science classes, going to survive socially and academically at a school of geniuses? When I was deferred in December, I knew this had to be the case. I had given up any hope of being allowed anywhere near this school. In a sort of last attempt at improving my application, I created a maker portfolio where I showed off some games that I made (one of them can be seen in post about Splash!). I submitted that the day before the deadline. And, of course, I used this as ammunition against myself. Everyone else probably submitted everything on time, but not me. In general, the period between November 1st and March 14th brought my self-esteem down to levels I didnt know I could reach. 3 months of self-loathing and feeling stupid for trying. Although, as a trans person, I probably couldve put self-loathing as an extracurricular. After March 14th, things didnt get much better. I was going to MIT!!! I was gonna go there to sink into mediocrity and failure. Everyone there is going to be better than me at everything and Im going to fade away into nothingness. Ill be no one. What chance did I have at a school filled with some of the smartest students in the world? I knew I wouldnt be able to survive and that my insecurities would force me to go elsewhere. My first few months here washed those feelings away. Yes, everyone here is super smart, but theyre also very kind and relatable. Everyone here is very normal (mostly). I wanna give yall some advice. Dont be so self-critical. Yes, some self-criticism is healthy and helps you stay grounded, but hating yourself for being not being perfect is excessive. I constantly hear people talk about doing badly in classes, or struggling with exams and coursework. Everyone here struggles, but we struggle together. Im on PNR so I dont have that much to worry about, but you can still feel it in the air. I hated myself for a long time for thinking I could go to a school where people never have trouble with school. Its hard to remember sometimes because of stereotypes and stories, but MIT students have academic difficulties too. Nobody here is perfect. Im not perfect. I failed two exams this week, one that should have been easy but I didnt prepare for, and the other one that I did prepare for but just kicked my ass. I also have to finish a Wikipedia article for next Tuesday (which I havent even started!) and work on a digital synthesizer for my music technology class (guess how far I am with this). Even before MIT, I remember having two emotional breakdowns the night before my THIRD subject test attempt (Math II and Physics). I remember reading that if you have at least a 700 on both exams, youre fine. I somehow managed to scrape by with my scores, but what if I didnt? Was it worth agonizing and tearing myself apart just to go to MIT? Even after getting accepted, the pain of the possibility of having it taken away from was to much to bare. I cried after chem exams because I would do horribly and I was always worried I would get rescinded. I made many jokes to my friends about it, but to me the threat was real. I still have this issue. I dont give myself room to breathe, room to have flaws, to make mistakes. Please dont be like me. Its easy to get caught up in admissions rates, SAT scores, GPAs, extracurriculars, but also give your self some time and space to back away from all of it. Please just remember, you arent the sum of all your scores, or extracurriculars, and youre definitely not where you go to college. Please just remember to take a break every once in a while, especially after hitting submit.